Nolo Contendere
Home
Nolo Contendere
Nolo Contendere and the UCMJ
History
FAQ's
Known as No Contest
Effect of this Plea
Guilty vs No Contest
Accepting Either Plea
Home
Nolo Contendere
Nolo Contendere and the UCMJ
History
Known as No Contest
Effect of this Plea
Guilty vs No Contest
Accepting Either Plea
Difference between Guilty and No Contest
The purpose of entering a no contest plea is often to avoid being sued civilly for essentially confessing to a crime, which is the basis of a guilty plea.
If the no contest plea restricts someone from sueing you civilly for an action, why would anyone enter a plea of “guilty” to charges against them?
Pleading guilty means you admit the charges, you have no defense for your actions, and the court can go ahead and levy punishment against you.
The court first ensures that you entered the guilty plea voluntarily and that they have some reason to believe you are telling the truth. It is not unheard of, for example, for a parent to plead guilty to a crime to protect their child. The prosecutor must explain what evidence they would have had against you had you pled not guilty and a trial had been set.
Pleading no contest or nolo contendere means you admit no guilt for the crime, but the court can determine the punishment. The judge will hold a conversation with the defendant to ensure s/he understands the plea and the possible punishment. This gives the defendant an opportunity to explain the circumstances and why s/he is pleading no contest instead of guilty or
not guilty
. Through this conversation, the judge gains a better perspective on the situation. The defendant has some possibility of getting a less harsh sentence than might be handed down after a jury trial.
Restrictions on pleading no contest vary between states, and in some jurisdictions it is prohibited. It is unlikely that the court will allow you to enter a nolo contendere plea while vigorously denying your guilt to the media. This would be known as an Alford plea, based on a 1963 murder case in North Carolina. The defendant pled guilty to second-degre murder to avoid the death penalty, but still vocalized his innocence.
Neither the nolo contendere plea nor the Alford plea could later be used in a civil action as evidence against the defendant.
States/Abbreviations
AK
Alaska
LA
Louisiana
OH
Ohio
AL
Alabama
MA
Massachusetts
OK
Oklahoma
AR
Arkansas
MD
Maryland
OR
Oregon
AZ
Arizona
ME
Maine
PA
Pennsylvania
CA
California
MI
Michigan
RI
Rhode Island
CO
Colorado
MN
Minnesota
SC
South Carolina
CT
Connecticut
MO
Missouri
SD
South Dakota
DE
Delaware
MS
Mississippi
TN
Tennessee
FL
Florida
MT
Montana
TX
Texas
GA
Georgia
NC
North Carolina
UT
Utah
HI
Hawaii
ND
North Dakota
VT
Vermont
IA
Iowa
NE
Nebraska
VA
Virginia
ID
Idaho
NH
New Hampshire
WA
Washington State
IL
Illinois
NJ
New Jersey
WI
Wisconsin
IN
Indiana
NM
New Mexico
WV
West Virginia
KS
Kansas
NV
Nevada
WY
Wyoming
KY
Kentucky
NY
New York
DC
Washington DC